Drinen rambles about something having to do with:
Tim Brown
Introduction to these player comments
In the Dante Stallworth and Marty Booker comments, I remarked on the fact that wide receivers are taking longer to develop now than they used to. The other side of that coin is that elderly wideouts, like Tim Brown here, are doing better than their geriatric counterparts from thirty years ago. In fact, the average age of the top 10 receivers from last year was 29.5, which is the oldest it's been since 1970, and I'd bet that it's the oldest it's ever been. Here is the average age of the top 10 WRs from each year since 1970:
avg age of Year top 10 WRs --------------------- 1970 26.0 1971 26.2 1972 27.6 1973 26.5 1974 27.0 1975 26.5 1976 26.6 1977 26.5 1978 26.1 1979 27.1 1980 25.9 1981 27.2 1982 28.0 1983 25.8 1984 26.6 1985 26.8 1986 26.6 1987 27.7 1988 27.4 1989 26.3 1990 26.6 1991 28.1 1992 27.5 1993 27.2 1994 28.9 1995 28.0 1996 29.3 1997 29.2 1998 27.9 1999 26.6 2000 28.4 2001 29.5 Brown's Raider running mate, 39-year-old Jerry Rice, slipped into the top 10 last year and that's the real reason that 2001 had the oldest top 10 receiving crew ever. However, the trend is very real. There are blips here and there, but the top receivers are slowly but steadily getting older and older. The same is not true, incidentally, of running backs or quarterbacks. The top 10 RBs are getting neither older nor younger. They've been holding steady (for the most part) at about 25-26. Likewise, the top 10 QBs have been about 29-30 for the last 30 years.
|